Commentary for Bava Metzia 64:2
דלמא משום דאיכא חסרון כיס וה"ק ומה טעינה דלית בה חסרון כיס חייב פריקה דאית בה חסרון כיס לא כ"ש
only because the verses are not clearly defined. But if they were, we would infer a <i>minori</i>.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That one is bound to unload, as above, and the verse would be unnecessary. ');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 64:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.